2026-09-10 06:51 UTC
I bet this is because LLMs stole her art for training, so now that the LLM users have pumped out thousands of slop-art aping hers down to the colour palate and brushstrokes, her originals also get identified as also AI.
Replies (3)
-
@Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 2026-09-10 07:30
This is exactly it. Also the reason that inputting an excerpt of a classical text (cfr. Dracula, Frankenstein, …) returns “likely AI” results - it’s literally what it was trained on.
-
@HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2026-09-10 08:16
While I don’t think you’re entirely wrong, I feel like this sentiment will lead people to believing AI content checkers more. The content checkers are wrong even for newer stuff. I always default to believing something is human made because I never want to accuse a real artist for using AI.
-
@Amir@lemmy.ml 2026-09-10 09:04
LLMs don’t steal art for training, image generation models are fed datasets by humans, which are then invoked by LLMs when prompted